Tamra Judge Fires Back at RHOC Lawsuit: I Can PROVE Jesus Jugs’ Husband is Shady! | Wireler
Former Real Housewife Alexis Bellino and her husband obtained a divorce this yr, and we even understand how a lot Alexis is getting.
But Jim Bellino is suing Tamra Judge and Shannon Beador for defamation … and he is demanding that they pay out $1 million.
Tamra is hitting again in courtroom, saying that he cannot sue her for defamation … as a result of all the pieces that she mentioned is true.
RadarOnline stories that Tamra Judge hit again at Jim Bellino’s lawsuit, asking the courtroom to dismiss the case.
A courtroom doc reads: “Judge’s Statements Regarding Spousal Support and Plaintiff Being ‘Shady’ Cannot Support A Defamation Cause of Action Because It Is True.”
Shannon and Tamra had gossiped somewhat about Jim when discussing his divorce, however Tamra’s staff argues that she did not say something that wasn’t true.
“Plaintiff specifically requests spousal support in his publicly available divorce papers,” the papers argue.
The paper provides: “In addition, Judge’s assertion that Plaintiff is a ‘shady motherf–ker’ is additionally not actionable as a result of it is true.”
Tamra’s staff did not make that assertion out of nowhere. They included some severe receipts.
“Shady means of doubtful honesty or legality,” the paperwork set up.
The doc mentions: “Plaintiff accepted a deal with the government that gave him probation after he was caught in an FBI investigation for his sale of counterfeit sports memorabilia. (Beaudin Decl. at Exs. 14-15, 18.)”
There are a number of well-documented items of proof that Tamra believes justify the assertion that Jim is “shady.”
There’s one other instance: “Plaintiff was sued for fraud, deceit, wrongful foreclosure, breach of written contracts, and other accusations in connection with his company’s foreclosure on a hotel property after receiving $2.13 million in a refinance loan. (Id. at Exs. 11, 14.)”
The paperwork proceed to checklist that which they consider to be shady about Jim.
The papers point out: “He faced foreclosure on a home for delinquent payments and then turned around a purchased a more expensive home the next year. (Id. at Exs. 12-13, 16-17.)”
The paperwork accuse: “He also allegedly hired and failed to pay an interior designer that resulted in legal action. (Id. at Ex. 19.)”
Folks, please pay the individuals whom you rent to do work.
Tamra’s staff asserts: “These actions all fall inside the purview of being ‘shady,’”
Jim, nonetheless, continues to rail towards each Tamra and Shannon.
“Tamra has slandered and defamed many people,” Jim claims. “This time she messed with the wrong person!! Shannon has severely lied about my business which affects my ability to support my family.”
“In their responses,” Jim continues. “Neither one of them addressed the true damaging statements they have made. It’s time someone puts a stop to their careless malicious attacks.”
Look, nobody is accusing Tamra of being a great individual. Her outrageous conduct has made her estranged from her daughter and has additionally made her into an unflattering meme.
But some really feel that this lawsuit is weak, an enormous overreaction, and even frivilous.
Their subsequent courtroom date is October 18, 2018.